The Religious Consultation
on Population, Reproductive Health  and Ethics
 


 revisiting the world's sacred traditions

 

Time, Mar. 17, 2011

Silent No More: The Women of the Arab Revolutions

By Carla Power

The uprisings sweeping the Arab world haven't only toppled dictatorships. Gone, too, are the old stereotypes of Arab women as passive, voiceless victims. Over the past few months, the world has seen them marching in Tunisia, shouting slogans in Bahrain and Yemen, braving tear gas in Egypt, and blogging and strategizing in cyberspace. Egyptian activist Asmaa Mahfouz, 26, became known as "The Leader of the Revolution" after she posted an online video call to arms, telling young people to get out onto the streets and demand justice. In Libya, women lawyers were among the earliest anti-Qaddafi organizers in the revolutionary stronghold of Benghazi. Arabs were bemused that the Western media was shocked — shocked! — to find women protesting alongside men. "There was this sense of surprise, that 'Oh, my god, women are actually participating!' notes Egyptian activist Hadil El-Khouly. "But of course women were there, in Tahrir Square. I was there, because I'm Egyptian. Everyone was there. You really felt we were all one."

But the bliss of revolutionary dawn never lasts. When Tunisian women's groups held a post-revolution rally to demand equality, thugs disrupted the gathering, yelling "Women at home, in the kitchen!" And on March 8, a march in Cairo to commemorate International Women's Day ended in violence, with gangs of men groping protestors and telling them to go home. "It was a horrible irony, that on International Women's Day, a march for women's rights could face that kind of egregious harassment in Cairo's Tahrir Square, a symbol of freedom," says Priyanka Motaparthy, a research fellow in the Middle East and North Africa division of Human Rights Watch. "It was an incredibly violent way of trying to scare [the women] out of the public space." (See 16 revolutionary women who changed the world.)

Women are good for revolutions, but historically, revolutions haven't been good for women. In 1789, French women took to the streets to protest against high bread prices and the excesses at Versailles. They helped topple the monarchy, but within a few years, the revolutionary government had banned all women's political clubs. In Iran, women came out in force to march against the Shah in 1979; Ayatollah Khomeini rewarded them by requiring the veil and curbing their legal rights. And now, as Tunisians and Egyptians hammer out the nature of their nations' futures, women are being required to fight for their rights in a whole new way. "There is no turning back," says Margot Badran, Senior Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center in Washington D.C., and the author of Feminism in Islam: Secular and Religious Convergences. "The violence [against the March 8 protestors] has only strengthened resolve."

The participation of women during Tunisia and Egypt's transitions to democracy remains a crucial litmus test of the revolutions. Exclude women, and the whole concept of sweeping away a privileged political caste crumbles. As Moroccan activist Saida Kouzzi observes: "If these countries continue to neglect the rights of the great majority of their citizens, then what good do these revolutions do?" (See why Egypt and Tunisia's revolutions are not finished yet.)

Already there are subtle — and not-so-subtle — signs that Arab women are being sidelined. Essam Sharaf, Egypt's new prime minister, named just one woman to his cabinet. For some women's rights advocates, his creation of a committee dealing with women's advancement smacks of tokenism. In Tunisia, activists are concerned about the potential rise of political Islam. Sheikh Rashed Ghannouchi, leader of Islamist party El Nahdha, who returned from decades of exile in January, has sought to soften his party's earlier line on women's rights, saying Tunisia's women need equality, and that he's supported the country's progressive Personal Status Code — which bans polygamy and child marriages, and guarantees women reproductive rights and equal pay — for over 20 years. Still, women are worried, says Nadya Khalife, of Human Rights Watch's women's rights division, in an email. "Women activists want to ensure that the gains [they have] made will not be set back by Islamist groups who may call for Shari'a law, or stand in their way to improve the Personal Status Code," she says. "Already, some Islamist groups have started calling for mosques to be established in schools, at the same time that women's groups are calling for the separation of church and state."

Egyptian women have been protesting the sexism they see creeping into their nation's transitional structures. The 10-member Constitutional Committee, which was tasked with coming up with constitutional amendments after the fall of president Hosni Mubarak, didn't include a single woman; the civil society group it consulted was called "The Council of Wise Men." Women's groups were further outraged when the Committee came up with Article 75, whose wording effectively limits Egypt's presidency to men. "Egypt's president is born to two Egyptian parents," it reads, "and cannot be married to a non-Egyptian woman." When women's groups protested, the framers argued that Arabic allows masculine nouns to include women. It didn't wash; a coalition of 117 women's groups is now calling for rewording. (Comment on this story.)

Some pundits have cautioned a go-slow approach for what they see as special interest groups. But activists fear that later could mean never. "Some people are saying, 'Now is not the time for women's rights, disability rights, children's rights,'" says activist El-Khouly. "They claim: 'Once there's democracy, there will be democracy for everyone.' But history has told us that women wait, wait, wait — and then our rights never become a priority issue." (See TIME's special package "The Middle East in Revolt.")

For women activists in Egypt and across the region, the spirit of the Arab revolutions means women's rights aren't special interests, but are intrinsic to the people's demands for social justice and democracy. "It's important to see women's rights as political rights," says Mozn Hassan, director of the Cairo-based group Nazra for Feminist Studies. "Women's activists have to change their dynamic, and engage with larger political issues. But we don't expect it to be easy. Tahrir Square was a utopia, and society doesn't change in fifteen minutes."

Back to Top

Send this page to a friend!

Home   About Us   Newsletters   News Archives