The Religious Consultation
on Population, Reproductive Health  and Ethics
 


 revisiting the world's sacred traditions

 

March 18, 2011

SAVING PARADISE: How Christianity Traded Love of This World for Crucifixion and Empire

By Rita Nakashima Brock and Rebecca Ann Parker
Beacon Press, 2008

Commentary by Daniel C. Maguire (maguired@juno.com)

There is nothing that stirs the human imagination as much as the tincture of the sacred . No area of literature produces the fantastical claims that religious literature does. To non-religious literature I say, "eat your heart out. You will never match us!" From Jupiter to Kali the Hindu Goddess to Jesus, from sexy Gods who create with masturbation or intercourse, to Gods who create chastely with a simple word, from the extravagant Gods of Sumer to the rambunctiously misbehaving Gods of Olympus, to the more disciplined specialized Gods who focus on agriculture, or fertility, or war.....the dramatis personarum divinarum is endless. As the ancient Thales said, everything is full of Gods and what a remarkable ensemble they are.

The Gods of religious imagination are never static; they grow in talent with the human species. With the invention of writing, they turned to script, whether on tablets of stone on Sinai or by sending angels with names like Gabriel or Moroni to write books or uncover hidden tablets filled with script.

So there it is, a literature and a lore filled with Gods, Goddesses, and demigods. There are divinized planets, mountains, and rivers and there are angels, and virgin births, resurrections from the dead, and the ability to ascend straight into the heavens without ever going into orbit.... we religionists have got it all.

Of course religious imagination must eventually come before the court of truth for a reckoning.
And in that court you must answer the two most neglected questions in religious studies: (1) How do you know that? And (2) So what? To religion scholars who don't ask and answer those questions, who put hermetic sealant around their cosseted orthodoxies, I give a failing grade. To Rita Nakashima Brock and Rebecca Parker I give an A+. They draw us out of a lockbox of orthodoxy with its rigid certainties and invite our minds into a symbol-rich experience of truth in poetic process. They invite us to feel that sanctum and pulchrum, the holy and the beautiful, are concentric circles.

Brock and Parker do a double service: they peel away the distortions of violent history and they rescue the poetic religious tradition from a prose reading.

Religious thought is like a barometer, always sensitive to the surrounding atmosphere. Gentle ideas of the early Jewish and Christian movements imbibed violence in violent times and were transformed in noxious ways. Brock and Parker are healers. Their task is difficult since they are treating illnesses that people have come to love. When you are born into these dogmatic illnesses they seem as real as the starry sky above. When I was a young priest saying mass, I did not feel that I was returning to the ancient penchant for human sacrifice. Yet on a daily basis, I offered God the crucified bloodied Jesus as a "holy victim," hostiam sanctam, in the hope it would lead to "perpetual well-being," salutis perpetuae. The communion bread at the Eucharistic meal was called "host," from hostia meaning victim. It was a reversion to the ancient belief that the Gods lust after blood, with human blood being the preferred offering. I didn't know I was involved in a playing out of paradise lost. The results of this twisted theology were and continue to be catastrophic for people and for this planet. Small wonder Catherine Keller could write that theology "over its complex and conflictual history has legitimated more violence than any other -ology."(On the Mystery, Fortress Press, 2008)

Secondly, in Saving Paradise, Brock and Parker rescue the poetry of the Jewish and Christian religious traditions from the shrinkage of literalism where symbols and metaphors are reduced to facts and simple events. Literalistic dogmatizers reduce poetry to journalism, they take teachings like "resurrection" and "ascension" and downsize them and de-symbolize them into happenings that could have been videotaped. The virgin birth could have been verified by an OB/GYN attending physician.

Small wonder timid minds shrink from symbols. Symbols can be as painful as pregnancy and birthing, leaving stretch marks where placid skin had rested undisturbed, but like birthing, they can give new life. That makes Brock and Parker radical and even shocking to those who grew up reading poetry as though it were prose. To borrow, or rather to steal a term, Brock and Parker are the real "radical orthodoxy" people. Their leading subversive question: was paradise a piece of real estate, a post-mortem experience, or a poetic envisioning of human moral possibility?

This book attains to classical excellence and like every classic it raises even more questions than it asks. I define religion as the response to the sacred however that sacred is explained, theistically or non-theistically. Much of historical religion is engaged in an idol-making effort to concretize the experience of the sacred, to reify it. In the enriching historical journey of the Brock and Parker book you can see early Christianity going about this localizing and reifying of the sacred with a kind of Hindu freedom and fluidity. Deifying Jesus by way of homoousios and doing it in the Nicene summer palace of an emperor of the same empire that killed Jesus, was by any definition a rocky start for Christology.. And it didn't settle it. A century and a half later at Chalcedon, at the call of another emperor, the sacrality of Jesus was still in debate, and so it was for centuries after that, until the deified Jesus finally froze into orthodoxy.

Truth discovered is not the end but the beginning of a process. Truth is a quest, not a quarry. False concretizing and dogmatizing stifles the process. In God talk, incarnation talk, trinity talk, afterlife talk, and paradise talk process is regularly short-circuited leaving us with cold idols in our hands. "Sacred" is an adjective; imagination presses us to make it a noun. This reductionism does not happen in the gifted hands of the authors of Saving Paradise. In this event of a book, Ezekiel's old dry bones take on flesh, and they don't just live and breathe, they dance and invite us to join in.

Rita and Rebecca, we are in your debt.

Back to Top

Send this page to a friend!

Home   About Us   Newsletters   News Archives